Meeting Time: June 23, 2026 at 5:00pm PDT

Disclaimer:

If you wish to attach any materials such as support letters or other informational items, please create and account and sign in. Once you have signed in you may attach up to three documents.

If you do not want your personal information included in the official record, do not complete that field.


Agenda Item

3. 2026-01177 An Ordinance Adding Chapter 12.73 of the Sacramento City Code, Relating to the Restriction of City Property for Civil Immigration Enforcement [Majority Vote Required] [In Lieu of Pass for Publication Ordinance to be Published in its Entirety]

   Oppose     Neutral     Support    
10000 of 10000 characters remaining
  • Default_avatar
    Amalia Evans at June 22, 2026 at 7:21pm PDT

    For over half a year the community has been asking for this to not just be a performative statement, but rather be a binding policy change. An update to city code has long been necessary, but this policy does not go far enough and so requires a continuance.

    Please don’t just pass this as is, our vulnerable neighbors need you to continue to work on this and strengthen this policy.

    The definition of surveillance needs to be expanded to include not just limitations on surveillance for “civil immigration enforcement purposes”, but more comprehensive safeguards on the city’s owned and contracted data and surveillance infrastructure.

    It is not enough to say that the federal government can’t surveil on city property for immigration enforcement, we need stronger and more encompassing language that creates a wider net of safety and requires technological compliance that matches the landscape of today’s reality.

    Please strengthen the language of this ordinance to ensure the City of Sacramento’s full non-cooperation with federal immigration enforcement and transform our values as a sanctuary city into tangible safety for our communities.

  • Default_avatar
    Kimberly Vanni at June 22, 2026 at 7:12pm PDT

    For over half a year the community has been asking for this to not just be a performative statement but rather be a binding policy change. An update to city code has long been necessary, but this policy does not go far enough and so requires a continuance.

    Please don’t just pass this as-is; our vulnerable neighbors need you to continue to work on this and strengthen this policy.

    The definition of surveillance needs to be expanded to include not just limitations on surveillance for “civil immigration enforcement purposes” but also more comprehensive safeguards on the city’s owned and contracted data and surveillance infrastructure.

    It is not enough to say that the federal government can’t surveil on city property for immigration enforcement; we need stronger and more encompassing language that creates a wider net of safety and requires technological compliance that matches the landscape of today’s reality.

    Please strengthen the language of this ordinance to ensure the City of Sacramento’s full non-cooperation with federal immigration enforcement and transform our values as a sanctuary city into tangible safety for our communities. Precision and strength of language here are protection. We all deserve peace and privacy. We deserve a city government that protects us all.

  • Default_avatar
    Drew Willkie at June 22, 2026 at 6:57pm PDT

    For over half a year the community has been asking for this to not just be a performative statement, but rather be a binding policy change. An update to city code has long been necessary, but this policy does not go far enough and so requires a continuance.

    Please don’t just pass this as is, our vulnerable neighbors need you to continue to work on this and strengthen this policy.

    The definition of surveillance needs to be expanded to include not just limitations on surveillance for “civil immigration enforcement purposes”, but more comprehensive safeguards on the city’s owned and contracted data and surveillance infrastructure.

    It is not enough to say that the federal government can’t surveil on city property for immigration enforcement, we need stronger and more encompassing language that creates a wider net of safety and requires technological compliance that matches the landscape of today’s reality.

  • Default_avatar
    Sofia Eva at June 22, 2026 at 6:23pm PDT

    Updates to city code have been necessary, but this policy does not go far enough and so requires a continuance.

    Do not pass this as is, our community members need you to strengthen this policy.

    The definition of surveillance needs to be expanded to include not just limitations on surveillance for “civil immigration enforcement purposes”, but more comprehensive safeguards on the city’s owned and contracted data and surveillance infrastructure.

    It is not enough to say that the federal government can’t surveil on city property for immigration enforcement, we need stronger and more encompassing language that creates a wider net of safety and requires technological compliance that matches the landscape of today’s reality.

  • Default_avatar
    Lori Follows at June 22, 2026 at 6:09pm PDT

    For over half a year the community has been asking for this to not just be a performative statement, but rather be a binding policy change. An update to city code has long been necessary, but this policy does not go far enough and so requires a continuance.

    Please don’t just pass this as is, our vulnerable neighbors need you to continue to work on this and strengthen this policy.

    The definition of surveillance needs to be expanded to include not just limitations on surveillance for “civil immigration enforcement purposes”, but more comprehensive safeguards on the city’s owned and contracted data and surveillance infrastructure.

    It is not enough to say that the federal government can’t surveil on city property for immigration enforcement, we need stronger and more encompassing language that creates a wider net of safety and requires technological compliance that matches the landscape of today’s reality.

    Please strengthen the language of this ordinance to ensure the City of Sacramento’s full non-cooperation with federal immigration enforcement and transform our values as a sanctuary city into tangible safety for our communities.

  • Default_avatar
    Sophia Pena at June 22, 2026 at 5:51pm PDT

    For over half a year the community has been asking for this to not just be a performative statement, but rather be a binding policy change. An update to city code has long been necessary, but this policy does not go far enough and so requires a continuance.

    Please don’t just pass this as is, our vulnerable neighbors need you to continue to work on this and strengthen this policy.

    The definition of surveillance needs to be expanded to include not just limitations on surveillance for “civil immigration enforcement purposes”, but more comprehensive safeguards on the city’s owned and contracted data and surveillance infrastructure.

    It is not enough to say that the federal government can’t surveil on city property for immigration enforcement, we need stronger and more encompassing language that creates a wider net of safety and requires technological compliance that matches the landscape of today’s reality.

    Please strengthen the language of this ordinance to ensure the City of Sacramento’s full non-cooperation with federal immigration enforcement and transform our values as a sanctuary city into tangible safety for our communities.

  • Default_avatar
    Erin Baber at June 22, 2026 at 5:46pm PDT

    For over half a year the community has been asking for this to not just be a performative statement, but rather be a binding policy change. An update to city code has long been necessary, but this policy does not go far enough and so requires a continuance.

    Please don’t just pass this as is, our vulnerable neighbors need you to continue to work on this and strengthen this policy.

    The definition of surveillance needs to be expanded to include not just limitations on surveillance for “civil immigration enforcement purposes”, but more comprehensive safeguards on the city’s owned and contracted data and surveillance infrastructure.

    It is not enough to say that the federal government can’t surveil on city property for immigration enforcement, we need stronger and more encompassing language that creates a wider net of safety and requires technological compliance that matches the landscape of today’s reality.

  • Default_avatar
    Tamie Dramer at June 22, 2026 at 5:01pm PDT

    June 22, 2026
    Honorable Mayor Kevin McCarty
    Sacramento City Council
    Sacramento City Manager Smith

    915 “I” Street, Fifth Floor
    Sacramento, CA 95814

    SUBJECT: Agenda Item 2: Resolution Adopting a Community Immigration Action Plan- Support
    Agenda Item 3: Ordinance Adding Chapter 12.73 of the Sacramento City Code, Relating to the Restriction of City Property for Civil Immigration Enforcement- Support

    Dear Mayor, Council and City Manager,

    On behalf of Organize Sacramento am writing in support of June 23rd, 2026 City Council Agenda Items 2 &3.

    ORGANIZE SACRAMENTO provides training, education, technical and personal assistance in the form of individual and group classes, presentations, research assistance and coaching in order to educate community groups, individuals, organizations, small business owners and others on techniques of community organizing, local government processes, and community and business resources. The purpose is to equip citizens to think and act strategically to produce positive results when community issues like the protection of immigrant residents become organizing campaigns.

    The federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Agency and its staff have been violating the rights of the residents of this country for far too long. We applaud the City of Sacramento’s efforts to rein in this federal agency’s disregard for basic human rights within our city limits.
    Organize Sacramento urges your support of this plan and ordinance.

    Sincerely,

    Tamie Dramer, Executive Director
    Organize Sacramento
    Tamie@OrganizeSac.org
    916.628.7709