Agenda Item

3. Grant: Gang Violence Suppression File ID: 2020-00855

   Oppose     Neutral     Support    
10000 of 10000 characters remaining
  • Default_avatar
    Vanessa Hernandez over 3 years ago

    Invest in community programs that work to prevent gang violence. Do NOT continue funding police and involving them in this issue.

  • Default_avatar
    Emma Johnston over 3 years ago

    As a resident of District 4, I am disappointed to see the city allocate a disproportionate amount of this grant to a single police officer while it continually under-funds community groups with a track record of achieving positive outcomes in Sacramento. If the city really wants to decrease gang violence then we need to cease police involvement and increase support for programming led by these community members who have navigated gang violence. Whenever community groups present at meetings, they face questioning to ensure that funds allocated to them have met intended objectives. Why don't police face this burden of proof? Study after study shows that having more cops doesn't decrease crime, but our public safety budgets refuse to implement an evidence-based approach. This reflects that our council would rather reinforce systems that oppress people than prioritize actions that prevent crime, reduce gang violence, and most importantly provide opportunity for young people in Sacramento.

  • Default_avatar
    Jacqueline Reynders over 3 years ago

    More money to police/DA will not stop gang violence. Invest in trusted community orgs/groups not the already bloated ineffectual and violent police!

  • Default_avatar
    Garrett Shields over 3 years ago

    Yet again, is upsetting to see that the lion's share of the money for another Sacramento program go to the police. One FTE eats up around 45% of this budget, with the next largest portion going to the DA's office. Investment in community-oriented and run programs police would be money better spent.

    Good intentions are not enough when the budget priorities enrich SPD and do not support the communities at risk. Instead, please prioritize funding to give community leaders the ability to lead these efforts. Look for other solutions than increased policing and increased funding to programs run by the police.

  • Default_avatar
    Curran Hamilton over 3 years ago

    Spend the money on proven community groups rather than police!

  • Default_avatar
    Logan Dreher over 3 years ago

    It simply does not make sense for this money to disproportionately go to a single police officer's salary. I don't understand how that would make any meaningful impact on gang violence. Police don't stop gangs, they only show up after crimes have been committed to punish people. If the SacPD can't stop gang violence with 30% of our general fund, why would a few more thousand dollars help? Please use this money to fund community organizations with a track record in actually stopping gang violence and stop contributing to our city's bloated police budget.

  • Default_avatar
    Lucy Cheadle over 3 years ago

    If the city really wants to decrease gang violence then they need to cease police involvement and implement programming led by community members who have navigated gang violence. The organizations who are actually doing the work and know how to have a positive impact are left with little to no support. Disproportionate funding between community organizations and the single officer that will be funded by this budget reflects a budget that upholds oppression and systemic racism in Sacramento. Voting yes on this item is a vote for systemic racism and injustice for our community.

  • Default_avatar
    Emily Edmond over 3 years ago

    Do not give this position to a police office; instead give it to local organizations that know what they're doing, because they've been doing it for a long time.

  • Default_avatar
    Kait Murray over 3 years ago

    I would like to express my concerns on how the budget in this item is being prioritized, and how these investments work in opposition to the goals of these grants. Policing goes not decrease gang violence, and investing the majority of this budget in one officer is not an appropriate use of funds. This money can be better invested in current and new grantees. Please do not approve this budget.

  • Default_avatar
    Felisa Concepcion over 3 years ago

    As a sister of someone who was formerly in a gang, this budget is really hurtful. This budget disproportionately funds one FTE police officer, twice as much as it does the community orgs actually doing the work. On top of that, the organizations are required to match 10 percent of the grant funding received. This is not okay City Council. Sacramento is so so so behind in restorative programming, even Oakland is a head of us. We need to be more innovative and open to reimagining public safety. Sending police to communities with gang violence is not the answer, instead it is harmful to Black and Brown lives. There are programs, such as CURE Violence, that has been proven to work to reduce violence .These programs are made up of community members, members that have navigated gang violence and have those relationships with involved folks. Please readjust this budget and remove the police dept, DA, and probation dept, the do not need more money they already have bloated budgets.

  • Default_avatar
    Dr Corrine McIntosh Sako over 3 years ago

    Please take the time to readjust the budget by removing the police officer, DA, and probation department from receiving funding. Instead, invest more in the community programs, and replace the police officer with a community member that has navigated gang violence and provide them with the training and tools to lead.The budget for this grant disproportionately funds one FTE police officer with 48 percent of the budget, and 68 percent of the budget goes towards the carceral system. This budget should be prioritized to invest in actual gang violence prevention, intervention, and recovery programming. City Council needs to start working towards programming that does not involve law enforcement or the carceral system. Sacramento has wonderful community leaders that can support this programming, and instead of one FTE police officer as the main POC it should be a community member who has navigated gang violence and is familiar with those experiences and the involved community members. 

  • Default_avatar
    james mizoguchi over 3 years ago

    Mayor Steinberg and City Council,
    My name is James Mizoguchi. I live in District 4. Thank you for taking the time to read and consider my comment.

    I am happy to see grant funding going toward community-based programs. However, I would ask you all to please reallocate as much funding as allowed by the grant’s conditions to community-based programming or programming that does not directly involve law enforcement or the carceral system. I believe that the communities which are most likely to be impacted don’t have enough trust in the police or the carceral system for them to effectively lead gang violence suppression programming. Please do not allocate grant funds to police or the carceral system. Please reallocate funds to community-based programs.